IDL

International Database on Longevity

Login | User Registration

IDL Project

Introduction
Database Structure
Data Quality & Validation
Confidentiality
Contributors
Terms of Usage

Database

Publications

Acknowledgements

Contact


Copyright & Legal



Max Planck Institute

IDL Project

Data Quality & Validation Process

The IDL contains thoroughly validated information on individuals of extreme ages. Data collection was performed in such a way that age-ascertainment bias is avoided.

Age validation

Because most reports of reputed supercentenarians are erroneous, age validation is essential to compilation of accurate data. The methods used for verifying age differ among countries. In view of these differences, the IDL provides information about how meticulously each case has been validated, what documents were provided to the IDL in the course of the validation process, and the name of the researcher responsible for the validation.
The variable VALIDATION assigns the validation level of a case to one of two categories. VALIDATION=A indicates full validation and requires that an early life document, preferably a birth record or baptism record, or an early census record, was available and has been checked. In the same way, the date of death of a fully validated case must also be backed up by a document, such as a death certificate or an entry in a death index.
For several countries, the validation procedure is not documented as thoroughly as full validation requires, but individual cases have been carefully checked. Such cases are tagged as VALIDATION=B. They can arise, for example, when a local residence register officially confirms a date of death, but does not issue any personal document on the individual. There may also be cases in which the sequence of entries in national censuses had been carefully checked by the respective national statistical office over the course of the individual's life.

Age ascertainment bias

The IDL emphasizes that data on validated supercentenarians are free of age ascertainment bias. This is important because some kinds of identification procedures may register people who are, e.g. 115, with greater probability than people who are merely 110. For example, media coverage is more common for the oldest cases, thus individuals who died at younger ages (i.e. shortly after their 110th birthday) may be underrepresented in the press. Such an age bias in the inclusion of supercentenarians in a database can result in serious misestimates of mortality patterns. Consequently, the IDL aims to compile lists of validated supercentarians in which the probability of identifying cases is age-independent.